Halimede / Science

Science · Halimede

What the research says about Halimede

Almost nothing has been published about Halimede on its own, so this page uses two family-level papers, all free to read on arXiv, about the group it belongs to. Each one is clearly labeled “Family-level”.

  • Papers 2
  • Topics 2
  • Reviewed Oct 24, 2026
  • Source arXiv.org
Illustrative · not to scale

Our own artist's impression. No figures are taken from the papers.

01

Surface & composition

1 paper

What Halimede is made of and how its surface behaves.

[1]2018astro-ph.EPPreprintFamily-level

Multicolor Photometry of the Neptune Irregular Satellite Neso

Michele Maris, Giovanni Carraro, Mario Melita & 1 other

What they foundFirst colours of Neptune's faint irregular moon Neso.

Why it mattersIt is a rare physical measurement of Neptune's outer moon family, which includes Halimede.

Family-level context: this paper studies Neptune's irregular moons, not Halimede specifically.

What they studied

VLT FORS2 photometry in July 2010.

02

Orbit & dynamics

1 paper

How Halimede moves, and the gravity and sunlight forces that shape its path.

[2]2006astro-phPeer-reviewedFamily-level

A Survey for "Normal" Irregular Satellites Around Neptune: Limits to Completeness

Scott S. Sheppard, David C. Jewitt & Jan Kleyna

What they foundA deep survey found Psamathe and showed Neptune has a 'normal' system of distant irregular moons.

Why it mattersIt places Halimede's family in context and sets limits on how many remain undiscovered.

Family-level context: this paper studies Neptune's irregular moons, not Halimede specifically.

What they studied

A survey of 1.75 square degrees near Neptune.

arXiv:astro-ph/0604552Abstract (opens arXiv)PDF (opens arXiv)

New research

New papers on Halimede, checked weekly, summarized after a person reads it.

RSS feed

No new papers on Halimede this week. We check arXiv every week.

How we choose papers

We search arXiv for Halimede papers and keep the ones that add something new, are clearly written up and are relevant to a general reader. A person reads every abstract.

Our own words, our own drawings

Summaries are written by us from each paper’s abstract, not copied. Diagrams are our own simplified drawings, not figures from the papers.

Preprint vs. peer-reviewed

“Peer-reviewed” means arXiv lists a journal reference for the paper. Everything else is marked “Preprint”: shared openly, possibly before or without journal review.

Paper metadata courtesy of arXiv. Summaries written by us; read the original papers via the links. Paper metadata from arXiv.org, which does not endorse this site.